The Middle East peace process 
Currently, the negotiations on a "peace" in the Middle East. The only problem is that standards from man apparently seem to have no validity.
As is a matter of course, a pressure means which is coupled to compensatory measures, see the settlers question. From the pure logic of her people would think that if the parties are interested in peace, give them wrong and show good will.
But not Israel. With absolute stubbornness to set against the condition of the Palestinians, to stop the settlements. Settlements - What is that?
, imagine:
Polish construction equipment and bulldozers crossing the border and begin to build in Germany somewhere. Impossible? Is not possible? If your country is called Israel, then yes!
is played down because otherwise the term "settlements". Man steals the Palestinians their land piece by piece. Already, all the fertile areas are sealed off by Jewish settlements. And if that is not enough: The settlements will be connected together with highways on which the Palestinians can not drive. It may not happen. That is, the settlements eat like ulcers through their country and separate villages of villages, people from their farmlands. This is done continuously and is also the use of depleted uranium part of the total depopulation and acquisition of Palestine. Only barren land leaves you (now) the Palestinians. East Jerusalem itself is not spared by the building mania. Even in those transplanted to artificial, while elsewhere still negotiating for peace every day new settlers who are returned by any peace negotiations, as the maintenance of the settlements are part of the peace negotiations ever, but they have always been the reason for their failure.
recently said the former Prime Minister Ehud Olmert about the history of the Palestinians and he was open to the ethnic cleansing. He gave the Palestinians even cheeky to blame for the failure of the last negotiations, in which prevailed the U.S., the return of 100,000 Palestinians. Israel had 20 000 in their home, the rest should be given U.S. visas and resettled in the United States. That the Palestinians have rejected Olmert sees this as a reason for the failure of the talks - to believe that?
Meanwhile, Hamas was known to the Jerusalem Post that she agrees to a peace. The only requirement is that retained by the UN limit of 1967. These boundaries are not recognized by Israel, because they now require more land (see below) and this offer by Hamas will be mentioned as little as one stubborn enemy by the Israel-hating Hamas must be maintained at all costs.
What is to be expected from these talks?
nothing. Because the term Ehud Olmert met at all 288 times for peace talks, and no single time there was a breakthrough. The last peace talks were declared to this dispute points to have failed:
1) The boundaries
Israel accepted the 1967 borders with the following exception:
In the West Bank, they called new country, a total of 6.5% of the total
2) Jerusalem
Israel offered to hand over the occupied Arab areas to the Palestinians, while the areas occupied by the settlers to benefit Israel. The Palestinians rejected the argument that the settlers illegally acquired land and the land legally still belongs to Palestine.
were also in the plan not yet implemented projects all of Israel. Again, this should move to Israel.
3) The situation of refugees
Israel offered for a period of 5 years each year only 1000 in the return of Palestinians to allow. The rest of the refugees should be a matter for the Palestinians, that Israel had the right of any to prohibit further return. If you think times that scattered more than 3.7 million Palestinians across the Middle East live in refugee camps, a number of 5000 comes as a lousy joke before.
The Palestinians demanded the enforcement of UN Resolution 194, in which the right to return any Palestinians will be given. This means that they must according to the UN decision back in their houses (which no longer exist), but Israel does not accept this resolution, of course.
4) The water problem *
Israel insists the sole control of all water resources to hold, as they do it anyway. This means that Israel must the only build dams and control the water distribution. Even today, the Palestinians without the authorization of Israel does not get water from their own soil, while Israeli settlements, this may no restrictions.
The Palestinian side claimed the other hand, that Israel provides compensation for the predatory exploitation of Palestinian water sources since 1967.
5) Security
Israel insists that the new Palestinian state must have no weapons (while Israel itself is armed to the teeth, and even has nuclear bombs). In addition, calls on Israel permanent military bases in the future Palestine. The Palestinians
however have called the standards that apply to any independent country: independence in all matters, whether security on land, sea or air. They also reject any occupation forces and call instead for an international interim force for the first years, which is in any case, the logical solution.
6) prisoners
Israel agrees to release all Palestinians who currently vegetate in their prisons without due process.
* Note Water Problem:
You can even check on Google Earth once the borders of Israel. Especially in the north to the Sea of Galilee. The boundaries are drawn there so striking that one really can only shake his head. Both banks of the lake are controlled entirely by Israel. The pomegranates in the market Aldi or any other fruit from Israel come with very high probability of here. This country was also stolen easily.
also Israel still occupies the Golan Heights on the ground, Hezbollah from there to grab more from Israel. It is rather that the source that feeds the lake is located here. These need to be checked.
